When I used BeOS, I had “security through obscurity” because the common “teenager hacking software” doesn’t understand BeOS. Note that the first generation of Intel-based Macs equipped with Core Solo or Core Duo processors is no longer supported.I’m the only one who’s touching my own MacBook but just to be safe I did install iAntiVirus and MacScan. Previous devices are supported by older releases. It runs on any Mac with a 64-bit Intel processor or an Apple Silicon chip. VLC media player requires Mac OS X 10.7.5 or later. Devices and Mac OS X version.
Quicktime 10.5.8 Free Password SafeSprinklers, fire hydrants, Quicktime For Mac Os X 10.5.8 grates, and keys, clocks, manholes, gold bars, diamonds, and drains will provide you with plenty of strategic possibilities.Quicktime 7 Pro For Mac Os X Free Password Safe For Mac Os X Canon Selphy Cp740 Printer Driver For Mac Os X Free Registry Cleaner For Mac Os X Draftsight For Mac Os X 10.5 8 Mac Os X 10.5 Download For Pc Free Spd-sx Wave Manager Ver.1.02 For Mac Os X Photo Editing Software For Mac Os XI don’t actually run an antivirus, viruses per-se aren’t the main malware vector for Macs and they take up a lot of resources. The cleaned-up interface and autofade features look great (like most things.Quicktime For Mac Os X 10.5.8 features a wide array of special objects that will help you stay one step ahead of the water. Very vulnerable.QuickTime X probably received the most interface tweaks in the Snow Leopard update.If security is a concern, tmp files should not be created with the default umask but should be created with the most restrictive permissions possible unless explicitly specified otherwise. Maybe I’ll give Thunderbird a try when they finally release a more native-interface release version like Firefox 3 is.Doesn’t matter. (Which does more than just selectively filter javascript domains.)I also run a program that scans versiontracker to see if my programs are up to date, as well of course as regularly running Apple Update for important things like Quicktime, Safari (even if you don’t use Safari, quite a few other programs do! The situation’s not as crazy as IE on Windows, but a lot of programs do use WebKit to display HTML and the like as well as the Dashboard, etc…) and the OS updates.If I was *really* concerned about security I’d also dump Mail.app in favor of Thunderbird or better yet Mutt or the like, but Mail.app is such a good mail program to use in Leopard that I can’t bear to be without it’s usability. What I do is harden my system as much as possible, by running an ipfw firewall (you can use a graphical front end to it like NoobProof or Waterroof) and little snitch, and using Firefox with the NoScript plug-in rather than Safari. On my Ubuntu box my umask is the standard 0022. But not regular tmp files. It’s hard to think of a time that a tmp file should be world readable.A temporary pipe or socket, perhaps, in some specific cases. That shouldn’t be the exception. And there are no files in /tmp which have read permission for ‘other’.Please point me to a version of Fedora that acts as you claim. Mktemp always creates files with mode 600. I just spot checked RHEL4 (based on Fedora Core 3) and Fedora 8. (Does MacOSX use /tmp?)Ubuntu/Debian is probably the only Linux distro that does chmod 600 tmp file creation.Nice try. (Which comes as no surprise.)That Apple can’t get this right is disgraceful, and rightly should make us wonder what other elementary blunders they are making elsewhere.Perhaps someone with MacOSX would like to run:And report their results. I’ve just spot-checked my /tmp tree and there are no files with read or write permission for ‘other’. Outlook for mac resets organixe viewSo much for that theory of yours.I suppose its my fault for believe you were claiming Ubuntu had some fancy magic in /tmp to keep file permissions set to mode 600 when actually all you were claiming is that one particular shell tool creates mode 600 files in /tmpNope. It also has world-readable files in /tmp. It depends on what tool creates the tmp file, doesn’t it? Did you think mktemp is the only tmpfile tool in the world? Here I thought you were claiming Ubuntu made all /tmp files mode 600.I just went to check a friend’s Ubuntu system. ![]() ![]() I don’t think I ever claimed it was standard policy, just that it happens. I claim that this happens whenever a programmer casually creates a temporary file without thinking about security.I went back to recheck what we were arguing about, and just before calling me a liar, you claimed there were no files in /tmp with read permissions for “other.” Obviously there are because I showed you some.-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 112 Jul 27 11:13 tmp.0.Psvn84-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 119 Jul 27 11:13 tmp.1.VOVSE2-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 168 Jul 27 11:13 tmp.2.mF7sC5-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 173 Jul 27 11:13 tmp.3.ZpQUfkI do not know what made those, but they look like temporary files. But I’m starting to get the impression that perhaps you are.I am not claiming that insecure temporary files are created by policy.I am claiming that they are created by default. Or perhaps just remarkably uninformed.I am certainly *not* claiming that Apple’s MacOSX creates insecure tmp files as standard policy. Any variance from that policy is considered a significant security bug and is fixed ASAP.And frankly, I find your claim that this policy applies to “only one shell tool” to be a bit sleazy on your part, Zan. Furthermore, all software which is part of the distro acts in the same way, unless there is some very good reason for allowing any expanded permissions. You seem to be intent on denying that insecure temporary files could ever be created by Linux/BSD/OSX programmers. From my side I regard you as remarkably uninformed. So what “falsehood” am I presenting?Interesting how perceptions differ. It is definitely provided with the distribution. Where you got this “impossible to create insecure tmp files” idea is a mystery to me. You misunderstood my original post (how, I’m not quite sure) and have been obsessing over the point, despite my having stated quite clearly that apps are free to shoot themselves in the foot, and despite your having admitted yourself that you misunderstood.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorPrince ArchivesCategories |